Preview the quality of our full 50+ prompt pack. No email required — just use them.
"Act as a public health researcher. Write a compelling needs statement for a [FOUNDATION NAME] grant targeting [HEALTH ISSUE] in [GEOGRAPHIC AREA]. Include: (1) current prevalence data with citations, (2) health disparity evidence comparing [TARGET POPULATION] to baseline, (3) existing service gaps, (4) consequences of inaction. Use CDC and state health department data sources. Tone: evidence-based but urgent. Length: 400 words."
"Act as an NSF program officer reviewing a CAREER proposal. Draft a Broader Impacts narrative for a project on [RESEARCH TOPIC]. Structure: (1) Which societal need does this address? (2) What specific activities will you undertake? (3) Who benefits and how? (4) How will you measure success? (5) What's your plan for broadening participation? Include at least one partnership with a minority-serving institution or community organization. Tone: confident, specific, measurable."
"Act as an NIH grants specialist. Write a detailed budget justification for Year 1 of an R21 grant studying [RESEARCH AREA]. The total budget is $275,000 direct costs. Include line items for: (1) PI salary and % effort, (2) research coordinator, (3) equipment over $5,000, (4) participant incentives, (5) travel to one conference, (6) indirect costs at 55% MTDC. Justify each item with a direct link to specific aims. Format: NIH SF424 style."
"Act as a program evaluator. Create a logic model and evaluation plan for a [PROGRAM TYPE] grant targeting [POPULATION] with the goal of [OUTCOME]. Format the logic model as: Inputs → Activities → Outputs → Short-term Outcomes → Long-term Outcomes. Then write a 300-word evaluation plan with: (1) process evaluation metrics, (2) outcome evaluation design (quasi-experimental preferred), (3) data collection timeline, (4) IRB considerations. Use measurable indicators."
"Act as an NIH study section reviewer scoring this Specific Aims page. Evaluate on: (1) Significance — does it address an important problem? (2) Innovation — what's new? (3) Approach — are the methods rigorous and feasible? (4) Investigator — is the team qualified? (5) Environment — is the setting adequate? Score each 1-9. Then give 3 concrete suggestions to improve the weakest area. Be blunt but constructive. Here's the aims page: [PASTE YOUR TEXT]"
These 5 prompts alone can save you 4-8 hours per grant application. The full pack includes 50+ prompts covering every section of NIH R01/R21/R03, NSF CAREER, and foundation grant applications — needs statements, budgets, evaluation plans, revision responses, and more.
At $27, that's less than $0.54 per prompt. One funded grant pays for thousands of copies.
Buy Now — $27 (Instant Download)If you write grants professionally, I can build a custom prompt library for your specific funders, program areas, and submission workflow.
📧 Ask about custom prompts →